[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some comments.
From: |
Peter Holdaway |
Subject: |
Some comments. |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:38:14 -0800 |
Hi,
I am trying out the new 4.1 monit and it looks very nice.
Two comments I would like to make are ...
1. File Timestamp
Removing the timestamp syntax from "check process" and limiting it to
"check file" is a bit annoying as it reveals in the http GUI the internals
of how I am using a regularly updated file timestamp to check if a process
is working correctly.
In 3.2, the easiest way to instrument a process for continuous monitoring
by monit was to add a file timestamp updating routine. I am now considering
creating a TCP port purely for monit's use.
It seems to me that it is inconsistent to allow a connection test inside a
process entry, but not a timestamp test.
Oh well ...
2. GUI ease of use.
May I suggest that you make it a bit easier to start/stop/restart
processes?
Enclosed is a wrapper we use around the monit HTTP GUI that I find very
convenient.
The Select link selects all the processes and the selection box will
stop/start or restart the selected processes.
It would also be nice if the groups were also visible in the http GUI,
perhaps by "grouping" processes in separate sections. :-)
Regards,
Peter Holdaway
Select
|
Server
|
Status
|
Uptime
|
CPU
|
Memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AppManager
|
running
|
11d 22h 0m
|
0.0%
|
0.2% [9776kB]
|
|
DualPDEMediationApp
|
running
|
11d 22h 0m
|
0.2%
|
0.7% [30080kB]
|
|
IPNetwork
|
running
|
11d 22h 0m
|
0.2%
|
0.2% [9432kB]
|
|
SS7Network
|
running
|
11d 22h 0m
|
0.0%
|
0.2% [11832kB]
|
|
StatusAlarms
|
running
|
11d 22h 0m
|
1.4%
|
0.3% [13520kB]
|
|
webmin
|
running
|
11d 22h 0m
|
0.0%
|
0.0% [3920kB]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Selected:
Start Selected
Stop Selected
Restart Selected
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Some comments.,
Peter Holdaway <=