|
From: | Jon Bright |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone evaluation in commercial project [long] |
Date: | Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:06:44 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:58:35 -0700, Nathaniel Smith <address@hidden> said: njs> Is being able to get at this history really so bad a thing? Maybe there is source of embarassment in it? :-) (nope, doesn't bother me. If you act stupidly and then make repairs, I can only see that as a responsible act, not a reason for embarassment. However, I know that a lot of people don't agree with this)
I can certainly imagine situations where I might want to release code to a customer, and I wouldn't want the customer to see some intermediate versions of that code (perhaps because they contain details pertaining to an intermediate customer).
-- Jon Bright Silicon Circus Ltd. http://www.siliconcircus.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |