[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca |
Date: |
Thu, 19 May 2005 12:23:45 -0500 |
On 5/19/05, Wim Oudshoorn <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> If you have the following revision graph:
>
> A
> /|\
> B C D
> / / \ \
> / E F \
> / / \ \
> / G H \
> / | | \
> | I J |
> \ / \ /
> K L
> | |
> M N
>
> and ask for
>
> monotone lca M N
>
> it will return A and not C.
But A *is* the least common ancestor (M->K->B->A; N->L->D->A). That
it's also an ancestor of a more distant common ancestor doesn't
matter. Distances can be funny that way.
Tim
- [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca,
Timothy Brownawell <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/05/19
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/05/20
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/05/20
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Florian Weimer, 2005/05/20
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in monotone lca, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/05/20