monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone build failure


From: Nathaniel Smith
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone build failure
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:24:46 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:38:10PM -0600, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> I am following the steps at http://venge.net/monotone/INSTALL.  I 
> downloaded and built enough of Boost.  Configure seemed to work fine.  
> The "make" step failed with the following error.
> 
> make: don't know how to make std_hooks.h. Stop in /usr/ports/devel/monotone.
> 
> I am running OpenBSD 3.5, gcc version 2.95.3 20010125 (prerelease, 
> propolice).  I downloaded monotone-0.20.tar.gz from the website on 14 
> July  (MD5 hash 3bdf4da35ff576a401483815952f4045).
> 
> I have no idea where this file (std_hooks.h) should come from.  What 
> other information would be useful to help track this down?

That is very strange.  There's a rule to build std_hooks.h in our
Makefile.am:

%.h: %.lua txt2c Makefile
        ./txt2c $< $(*F) >address@hidden
        cmp -s address@hidden $@ || mv address@hidden $@
        rm -f address@hidden

which _should_ have been copied through by automake/configure to the
makefile you're using.

Perhaps you need to use 'gmake' instead of 'make'?

(I'm also not sure that a gcc 2.95.3 prerelease will be able to handle
monotone's code; that compiler is _very_ old, and has many many
C++-handling bugs.  But that's a separate issue, that you haven't had
a chance to run into yet.  Perhaps it will work, who knows.)

-- Nathaniel

-- 
When the flush of a new-born sun fell first on Eden's green and gold,
Our father Adam sat under the Tree and scratched with a stick in the mould;
And the first rude sketch that the world had seen was joy to his mighty heart,
Till the Devil whispered behind the leaves, "It's pretty, but is it Art?"
  -- The Conundrum of the Workshops, Rudyard Kipling




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]