[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:50:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:43:22PM +0200, Zbynek Winkler wrote:
> I see that the 0.22 package uploaded to debian unstable depends on
> boost1.33 that does seem to be getting into testing :(. So I've
> downloaded the 0.23 packages from the monotone website. That depends on
> 1.32. Is this what is going to be in debian proper? I am not realy sure,
> but should it still depend on libboost-filesystem? I rememeber reading
> something about rewrite of the path handling code... And does it realy
> have to have 4MB? :(
The packages on the website are the ones that random people (e.g., me)
built; they get rebuilt by the official deb maintainer when they get
uploaded into debian proper. So they're not necessarily the same.
We do still depend on libboost-filesystem, it's just much less central
(we don't use it on common code-paths, and the places we do use it
have been mostly factored out into a few parts, instead of being
tangled through the code).
> PS. Do I have a chance of trying out the usher-thingy using the package?
Yes, though you'll need to grab the sample proxy code from someplace
like
http://grahame.angrygoats.net/viewmtn/fileinbranch.psp?branch=net.venge.monotone&path=contrib/usher.cc
Note that it's all a bit experimental and rough-edged as yet.
-- Nathaniel
--
Details are all that matters; God dwells there, and you never get to
see Him if you don't struggle to get them right. -- Stephen Jay Gould
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Chad Walstrom, 2005/10/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/08
- usher and roaster? [was Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction], Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/11
- Re: usher and roaster? [was Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction], Jon Bright, 2005/10/11
- Re: usher and roaster? [was Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction], Larry Hastings, 2005/10/11
- [Monotone-devel] Re: usher and roaster?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/10/11
- [Monotone-devel] Re: usher, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: usher, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction,
Nathaniel Smith <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/07
Re: [Monotone-devel] Merging cvssync in small pieces: Pipe abstraction, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/08