Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: new default get_netsync_*_permitted hooks

[Timothy Brownawell]

On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 01:16 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 17:01:19 -0500, Timothy 
> Brownawell <address@hidden> said:
> 
> tbrownaw> On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 15:46 -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> tbrownaw> > On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 21:40 +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> tbrownaw> > > Finally, I don't think I like the syntax you propose.  
> tbrownaw> > > Is this already used somewhare? 
> tbrownaw> > > I think access control configuration is used in lots
> tbrownaw> > > of places, so maybe there is already a thought out
> tbrownaw> > > format for these kind of things.  
> tbrownaw> > > But he, I am not an expert on this at all.
> tbrownaw> > 
> tbrownaw> > I don't think its great either, but I'm not sure what would be 
> better.
> tbrownaw> 
> tbrownaw> Random idea:
> tbrownaw> 
> tbrownaw> 
> tbrownaw> pattern "net.example.project.{security,private}*"
> tbrownaw> allow "address@hidden"
> tbrownaw> allow "address@hidden"
> tbrownaw> 
> tbrownaw> pattern "net.example.{public,project}*"
> tbrownaw> others "allow"
> 
> Random response:
> 
> I think it's quite confusing how the format is sometimes
> 'verb "subject"' and sometimes 'subject "verb"'.  I would rather have
> some kind of consistency:
> 
>  pattern "net.example.project.{security,private}*"
>  allow "address@hidden"
>  allow "address@hidden"
>  
>  pattern "net.example.{public,project}*"
>  allow "*"

But there needs to be some form of 'others "continue"'. Maybe 'continue
"true"', or just 'continue' without arguments?

Tim