Re: [Monotone-devel] Problems after building monotone

[Zack Weinberg]

On 7/20/06, Justin Patrin <address@hidden> wrote:
> The manual compile I did most certainly didn't have anything but the
> default optimization in monotone's build scripts. I've tried both 0.25
> and 0.27 at -O0 and it made no difference. -O3 worked fine before for
> 0.25.

Ah.  That probably rules out the compiler, then.  -O0 miscompiles are
rare, but they do happen.

I think what we'd like to see next is the backtrace at -g -O0.  Also,
try running under valgrind (again, the unoptimized version) and tell
us what it prints for the very first invalid memory access that isn't
in setlocale().  (glibc is buggy.)

> Could it be my boost or gcc versions? They were both likely
> updated since I originally installed monotone.

It can't hurt to make sure the boost libraries were compiled with the
compiler you have installed, but I doubt this is the problem.

zw