Re: [Monotone-devel] Improving client side performance of pulls

[Matt Johnston]

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:14:43AM -0700, Eric Anderson wrote:
> I've been looking into the cpu usage of pulls on the client.  Below is
> the oprofile sampling from doing a pull of the monotone database,
> measuring only the client.  Note that to actually get useful data on
> where time is spent not in the monotone code itself, I found I had to
> statically link to get the symbols for decoding.
> 
> 412229    7.8868  __pthread_alt_unlock
> 364334    6.9705  __pthread_alt_lock
> 333146    6.3738  memset

> Does anyone have some other ideas?  All of these solutions seem bad.
> If there aren't other ideas, opinions on which is the "least-bad"?

Just wondering, does -fno-threadsafe-statics make any
difference? It does on OS X, though I think that may be a
platform-specific bug.

Matt