Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: There's something FISHY with the latest code...

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <address@hidden> on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:51:58 +0100, Bruce Stephens 
<address@hidden> said:

monotone> Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:
monotone> 
monotone> [...]
monotone> 
monotone> > But you're right that that probably means get_current_revision_id is
monotone> > a bit wrong: maybe it ought to be get_base_revision_id or something?
monotone> 
monotone> Shows how out of touch I am.  There is such a thing, of
monotone> course (called get_base_revision_id).

You and me both, bud.  I completely missed that one, and didn't read
Zack's mail well enough (he does mention get_base_revision_id!)...

Sorry for the stirr, folks!

monotone> I guess the question is should there be a special case for
monotone> when there's no changes, so that get_current_revision_id
monotone> returns the same as get_base_revision_id?  (My hunch is that
monotone> it doesn't matter, so it may as well be left as it is.)

Since there is get_base_revision_id, I don't care any more :-).

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis