[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Meta-policy proposal
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Meta-policy proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:23:58 -0500 |
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 15:59 -0700, Rob Schoening wrote:
> Does monotone have a concept of a "project"? I didn't think it did,
> other than by convention.
>
> I'm not necessarily saying that it should, but since a lot of this
> use-case discussion revolves around authorization issues in the
> lifecycle of a project, it does beg the question somewhat.
It doesn't, currently. Our discussion here is pretty much about how to
give it one.
> Tim, how do you partition "projects" today in your multi-tenet setup?
Each project gets it own db and server process, and these are
multiplexed over a single port based on hostname. (This is particularly
suboptimal for projects with shared history, such as by importing
libraries with merge_into_dir.)
Tim
--
Free (experimental) public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net