[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?
From: |
Daniel Carosone |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:53:33 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:07:32PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > VPN - extra overhead and installation can be clumsy.
>
> Yeah, but if your code is secret enough that you're worried about people
> using packet sniffing to get at deltas (not even complete files), then
> you probably already *have* a VPN set up to redirect everything you do
> through the corporate firewall anyway...
*And* you better have disk encryption for your database and
workspaces, and secure platforms and applications to protect the data
in them, and... a number of other important things monotone isn't
going to be able to solve for you.
--
Dan.
pgpLMBXPeTuaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Cem Karan, 2006/10/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Jeronimo Pellegrini, 2006/10/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Timothy Brownawell, 2006/10/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Cem Karan, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Dirk Hillbrecht, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/10/25