[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?
From: |
Jeronimo Pellegrini |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:12:26 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:11:02AM -0400, Cem Karan wrote:
> Finally, before anyone suggests I work on this myself... because of
> where I work, any code that I wrote would be legally encumbered (and
> that is according to the lawyers I just talked to here) The most I
> can do is give general outlines of what to do. Hope someone is
> willing to pick this up and run with it! :D
Unless the institution itself decides to contribute the code (happens
a lot with some companies, and I seem to vaguely recall of some military
institutions contributing free/open sour code). The problem is that
a manager's approval is not enough, and you'd need the institution's
approval... :-)
J.
- [Monotone-devel] Re: netsync transport encryption?, (continued)
- [Monotone-devel] Re: netsync transport encryption?, Bruce Stephens, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Jeronimo Pellegrini, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, jp+mtn, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Chad Walstrom, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Jeronimo Pellegrini, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Jeronimo, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?, Jeronimo, 2006/10/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?,
Jeronimo Pellegrini <=