Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [Monotone-debian] monotone 0.41 packages built

[Zack Weinberg]

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Ludovic Brenta
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> [1024-bit GPG key]
> That's not a problem; the only problem is that it is unsigned.

The real problem with it from my POV is that it's very old and I don't
have all that much confidence in the security of the private key
anymore.  Unfortunately it does have useful signatures, and it would
be a pain to start over.

>> Also, I guess it's a live question whether these should actually go to
>> unstable right now given the freeze.  Thoughts?
>
> As this new version does not correct any release-critical bug, I don't
> think it will be approved for lenny. We can always ask debian-release@
> after it's built on all architectures, though.

I don't think we should ask for a freeze exception; the question in my
mind is whether we should upload to unstable at all, or instead to
experimental for the time being.

zw