|
| From: | Daniel Carrera |
| Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Monotone server |
| Date: | Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:58:21 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) |
Bruce Stephens wrote:
In which way are signatures more pervasive in monotone?Every cert is signed. ... "mtn commit" always adds four certs (author, date, branch, changelog). The revision itself is not signed, but those four things are (and they reference the revision).
Ok. But the signature also covers the SHA1 sum of the revision, right? If the SHA1 sum is signed that's equivalent to signing the revision.
Daniel.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |