Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: netsync connection info cleanup

[Thomas Keller]

Am 28.04.2010 08:42, schrieb address@hidden:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 04:54:01PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> So, how about this?
>>
>>   
>> protocol://address@hidden/path/to/database?include,include,-exclude,-exclude
>>
>> should work equally well for mtn (with usher), ssh, and file.  Without
>> usher, you just leave out the /path part.
> 
> Does this mean that, with usher, it will now be mandatory to specify the 
> database explicitly?  That usher will no longer be able to make 
> decisions based on the branch name(s) involved?  And that, to a user,  
> usher-based monotones will look different from bare monotones?

No, this is merely an extension to usher (which iirc has already been
partially implemented by Tim) to have a third way to pick a database for
usher where DNS is not possible and branch pattern uniqueness might not
always be given.

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature