Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone

[Hendrik Boom]

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body
> >> of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in
> >> particular, code under v2-only).  It would also make us
> >> license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds
> >> restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2).
> >
> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2.
> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3.
> 
> I said v2-only.

Yes, we're in agreement.  The v2-only item was at the end of my first 
sentence.  The mtn code should be GPL2+, mentioned at the start of both 
sentences.

Sorry if that wasn't clear.

-- hendrik