[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:41:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
CooSoft Support <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Git is far too complex in certain areas and it's easy to loose
> stuff.
Too complex? In some sense, yes. The set of commands is rather random,
not consistent (it's obvious that much of it grew rather than being
designed). I disagree that it's easy to lose things: it's easy to throw
things away, but once you've committed something it's difficult to lose
it (unless you remove .git, which I guess isn't impossible coming from
monotone where the database is outside your checkout).
[...]
> Perhaps more plugging of mtn on the internet?.... To get the git
> rejects?
Make sure you've got something to offer. Back in the day there weren't
many practical DVCSs, but nowadays I'd guess that fossil would be a more
likely refuge for people who don't like git or mercurial. (Not sure who
bazaar attracts; I find it peculiarly opaque.)
[...]
- [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Judson Lester, 2011/12/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Thomas Keller, 2011/12/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Stephen Leake, 2011/12/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, CooSoft Support, 2011/12/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, CooSoft Support, 2011/12/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Bruce Stephens, 2011/12/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Judson Lester, 2011/12/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, CooSoft Support, 2011/12/14
Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Hendrik Boom, 2011/12/13
Re: [Monotone-devel] Status of blue sky ideas?, Zack Weinberg, 2011/12/12