[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration
From: |
schwartz+l-nmh-workers |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration |
Date: |
3 Feb 2004 11:04:22 -0500 |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:04:22 -0500 |
| (e.g., "Nmh-Return-Path"), so there is no confusion and it's completely
That's better than nothing, of course.
So what about Sender? Will we be allowed to set that header?
And can we make "masquerade: draft_from" the default?
| Actually ... the more I look at nmh, the more I am missing something.
| Nmh, as currently written, if you're using the "sendmail" MTS, is just
I've always used spost. No SMTP involved.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Robert Elz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration,
schwartz+l-nmh-workers <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+nmh-workers, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Paul Fox, 2004/02/03