[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current developmen
From: |
Neil W Rickert |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development") |
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2005 13:35:44 -0500 |
Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> wrote on May 12, 2005:
>On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:32:52PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> Hey guys, can we concentrate on more important things ... like making fun
>> of all of those losers who are using mutt? :-)
>I would use nmh more often if it understood how to dequote MIME text
>before a reply. ;-)
When using command line nmh, I do
mhstore -part 2 ## that usually the text part.
then, in reply
:r !dosixq filename.txt
where "filename.txt" is what mhstore wrote. Here "dosixq" is just a
small script that converts DOS line endings to unix line endings
(sometimes needed), quotes each line with "<", and adds a little
comment about why sending html is a bad idea. The latter is because
most of the messages that need this treatment are multi-part
alternative with an html component.
I could probably automate the above with a shell script replacement
to "repl", but fortunately most of my email is still plain text, so
it hasn't been worth the effort.
But I mostly use exmh (with "vi" as editor), and in that case I can
just use
:r !dosix2 @
to bring in the appropriate reply text.
-NWR
- [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, K Suominen, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Peter Galbraith, 2005/05/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/11
- [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Bill Wohler, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/12
- [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"),
Neil W Rickert <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jerry Peek, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Jon Steinhart, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Paul Fox, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10