Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.1 release candidate 4

[Peter S Galbraith]

Josh Bressers <address@hidden> wrote:

> Might I suggest we call it 1.2 to avoid confusion.

> I have used the nmh-1.1.tar.gz to create the Fedora Core nmh packages, so
> having a new nmh tarball with the same version is going to cause some pain
> for any packagers who have used that source.

I'm not the maintainer for the Debian package, but 1.2 would be better
for Debian as well.

Peter