[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal) |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2006 09:31:54 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nathan Bailey <address@hidden> writes:
> I can see a whole bunch of empty directories being a waste, but
> .mh_sequences does need to be stored somewhere. Perhaps there should
> just be a $HOME/[Mail/].imap-mh_sequences that has all of them?
These are the public sequences. As Joel mentions, putting them on the
server would be ideal. Private sequences can still go in the context
file, of course.
If, as Ken mentions, we can't have true public sequences, maybe all
IMAP sequences will just have to be private and stashed in the
context file. There's probably not much point in a separate sequences
file for IMAP.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/06
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal),
Bill Wohler <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Mike O'Dell, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Mike O'Dell, 2006/01/08
- [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Robert Elz, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Chris Garrigues, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Josh Bressers, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ?, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/10