[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?
From: |
markus schnalke |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:53:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
nmh 1.3 |
[2010-01-28 10:28] Earl Hood <address@hidden>
> On January 28, 2010 at 10:55, markus schnalke wrote:
>
> > Nmh should work on a mailbox in the local filesystem. Incoming mail
> > should enter as plain-text through inc. Outgoing mail should leave as
> > plain-text to an MTA.
>
> Not sure about this statement, especially "plain-text".
>
> MH was written at a time when security considerations were
> not given much thought. I think TLS support for submitting
> email to an MTA has become more of an essential function
> of MUAs (and the common GUI-oriented MUAs do support this).
I talk about the transfer from nmh's send command to
/usr/sbin/sendmail for example. That means from one local command to
another local command via a pipe. There is no network involved.
The local MTA will then care about encryption and authentication for
the transfer over the network.
> I'm not sure it is safe to assume that someone is able
> to install and run a third-party program on their local
> system to work as a secure submission proxy for nmh.
See it as dependency to the nmh package, like a library.
However, I don't want to discuss against you on how exactly to realize
this. You could probably tell me better. But I want to tell you, that
you should *freely* think about it.
Currently, I mostly hear: ``No it can't be done''.
Doing unusual things is always hard, but nmh is unusual too, and we
all love it because of that.
(Read the SMTP-only decision in ``The Cathedral and the Bazaar''!)
meillo
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, markus schnalke, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?,
markus schnalke <=
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), bergman, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Earl Hood, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/28
- Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA? (Was: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?), Sean Kamath, 2010/01/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, Ken Hornstein, 2010/01/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, rader, 2010/01/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh @ gsoc?, David Levine, 2010/01/26