[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:01:43 +0000 |
Earl Hood wrote:
>On February 3, 2010 at 15:23, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> Given that the vast majority of nmh users are probably on laptops or
>> single-user desktop boxes rather than large central servers with untrusted
>> other users on them, and your code *is* an improvement, I think the best
>> thing to do is drop in your patches, leave a TO_DO comment block in there
>> about what's still needed, and we revisit it if it ever becomes an issue.
>
>Okay.
Yeah, I think I agree (best is the enemy of the good, and all
that). I have no objection to you committing this.
-- PMM
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, (continued)
[Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
[Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Peter Maydell, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Sean Kamath, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Sean Kamath, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Chad Brown, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03