[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs
From: |
Tom Lane |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:46:28 -0400 |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>> What still doesn't have /dev/random, and what does software do to compensate?
> I'm only mentioning this because we got recent bug reports about
> things not working right because of a buggy snprintf() on an ancient
> HPUX box. Does the ancient HPUX box in question have /dev/random? Good
> question; dunno.
That was mine, and no it doesn't have /dev/random. But, as I said
earlier, I'd prefer to opt-out of this whole cryptographic host part
concept anyway. I think as long as you provide an option to still use
the regular host name for message IDs, people who don't have /dev/random
have an escape.
regards, tom lane
- [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, David Levine, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Tom Lane, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs,
Tom Lane <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/19