[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Message-IDs and Content-IDs |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:23:38 -0500 |
Valdis wrote:
> Looks good to me - but will some busticated software that assumes everything
> after the @ is syntactically (if not semantically) a "hostname" get upset at
> the + in there? (Personally, I don't care, all of my stuff just want a unique
> string inside the <>, and if my stuff is busted I'll beat the snot out of
> whoever
> wrote it and then get it fixed ;)
I'll find out :-)
Non-qualified hostnames do get used, even to this list. I
looked at a small collection of spam and saw hardly any
random "hostname" parts, but the sample is biased (it got
through some filters) and very small.
David