[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:18:41 +0100 |
Hi Jon
> address@hidden writes:
> > and just sent a PDF with the msg body in plain text via...
...
> > I expected, would have liked to have sent, is the msg body as plain
> > text.
> >
> > What I actually received was the msg body encoded as
> > application/octet-stream in base64.
>
> What's your .mh_profile look like? Have you told it what to do with
> PDF files? If not, then it's pretty likely to default to
> application/octet-stream.
I took rader's issue to be that the plain text he wrote to accompany the
PDF has come out as "application/octet-stream in base64"?
Cheers, Ralph.
- [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Kevin Cosgrove, 2012/08/09