[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:08:55 -0500 |
>couldn't one just skip the whole "what's a shell metacharacter these days?"
>issue, and just always go for door #3?
I dunno ... maybe it's just me, but it seems ... inelegant to always use
door #3. Yeah, this isn't 20 years ago when processes were more expensive,
but it just bugs me. Also, I was basing this on prior art (it's what
Perl does).
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Oliver Kiddle, 2013/01/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/18