Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again

nmh-workers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again

From:	Ken Hornstein
Subject:	Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:54:13 -0500

>It would solve the warning, but not the bug in the code, which is
>the missing explicit cast to int required to match the is* function
>prototype.

Is that required?  Won't the prototypes for the is* functions take
care of it?

--Ken

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, David Levine, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/04
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ken Hornstein <=
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Tom Lane, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, David Levine, 2013/02/04
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/04
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, David Levine, 2013/02/05
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/05
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Paul Vixie, 2013/02/05
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again, David Levine, 2013/02/05

Prev by Date: Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up
Next by Date: Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again
Previous by thread: Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again
Next by thread: Re: [Nmh-workers] Compiler warnings and signed vs. unsigned char, again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread