[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:08:55 -0700 |
On 2013-04-24, at 6:54 PM, Tethys wrote:
> but I
> think it's functionality that nmh should be providing out of the box.
> It's a common enough thing these days that we really shouldn't expect
> users to have to hack up their own scripts to handle it.
Common for you is not common for me. And common for me is guaranteed to not be
common for you.
MH is a multiplexor for MIME body parts. Nothing more. And it never should
be. Google "cat -v considered harmful" and start with Rob Pike's Usenix paper.
--lyndon
- [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Robert Elz, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, bergman, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Robert Elz, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Tethys, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Mike O'Dell, 2013/04/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Michael . Urban, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Responding to calendar requests, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/24