[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 21:52:13 -0400 |
>> Yeah. We'd store the original contents of the headers, of course,
>> but they wouldn't go through any additional parsing until they were
>> accessed.
>
>Ah. I thought you were talking about a lazy evaluation parser.
Hm. I defer to your experience benchmarking other MIME parsers, but
exactly what you were you thinking of, and how does it differ from
what I described?
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, bergman, 2014/08/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Jon Fairbairn, 2014/08/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Mike O'Dell, 2014/08/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/09