[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject)
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:07:20 -0400 |
Ken wrote:
> [David:]
> >
> >Best-first has some appeal to me: I start at the top, see
> >text/html or something else I can handle, and go with that
> >without bothering to look at the other alternatives.
>
> Meh. Everywhere else nmh presents MIME parts in the order in
> which they occur in the message; from what I can tell,
> multipart/alternative was reversed just so the display code
> would be easier to write. This seems like a lousy exception.
mhlist is a counterexample. And a good one.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject),
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject), David Levine, 2014/08/20