[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:59:38 -0800 |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>>I would like to suggest that mhl, show, mhshow, scan and any other mhl program
>>that displays a message, all have a flag, that would take an argument
>>specifying how the time of the message was to be displayed. It would specify
>>one of:
>
>I don't have a problem with that in theory, but practical matters raises
>their ugly heads.
>
>First, we have a lot of command-line switches. That's kind of
>unavoidable with individual commands. But adding more to the mix might
>not be the right approach.
Yeah, you are right.
>
>Second, we already have an extension mechanism that can do all of
>that: mh-format(5).
In the meantime, would somebody be willing to send me one that does elapsed
time? I don't much care about the time unit, though I prefer days.
Norman Shapiro
- [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, norm, 2015/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, David Levine, 2015/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates,
norm <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, norm, 2015/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Back to Dates, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/06