[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:39:42 -0800 |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>Secondly, when a mh-format program is run, it _cannot_ fail; literally,
>there's no facility for it to fail. When it gets compiled, yes, that
>can fail. But return an error code? We don't really have a good way
>in mh-format to deal with this. I think it might be too much.
I would be content to just ignore the exit status.
Norman Shapiro
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Jerrad Pierce, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function,
norm <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Paul Fox, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/12