[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:04:30 -0800 |
David Levine <address@hidden> writes: (8 days ago)
>Norm wrote:
>
>> Ken writes:
>>
>> >Secondly, when a mh-format program is run, it _cannot_ fail;
>> >literally, there's no facility for it to fail. When it gets
>> >compiled, yes, that can fail. But return an error code? We don't
>> >really have a good way in mh-format to deal with this. I think it
>> >might be too much.
>>
>> I would be content to just ignore the exit status.
>
>I don't think that's a good idea.
>
>I just committed the multiply function. It was trivial.
Did that entail a change in sbr/fmt_compile.c ? If so, would it work if I just
replaced my version of sbr/fmt_compile.c, with the revised version and
rebuilt? If so, AND if it's not a lot of trouble, may I have the revised
version?
Norman Shapiro
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Paul Fox, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function,
norm <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/01/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/18