[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] semantics of mhshow -type and -part
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] semantics of mhshow -type and -part |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:56:11 -0500 |
i wrote:
> i've implemented what i think is the right behavior for -part and -type.
> the only real change (i think) from past behavior (besides the bug
> fix that i set out to take care of) is that if you specify a part
> with -part, it will definitely selected to appear in the output.
> as in the current codebase, -type switches apply to parts already
> selected with -part (or all parts, in the absence of -part) -- i.e.,
> they act as a further filter. specifying a multipart/alternative
i've just pushed these changes.
paul
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 30.4 degrees)
[Nmh-workers] overriding multipart/alternative ordering, Paul Fox, 2015/02/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] semantics of mhshow -type and -part, David Levine, 2015/02/02