Re: [Nmh-workers] DKIM verification support

[norm]

Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>When I was looking at Bob's spam problem, I started thinking ... is there
>any interest in support DKIM signature verification of messages?  It looks
>relatively straightforward.  It could be rolled into some hypothetical
>S/MIME support.  This is just a vague thought, but I thought it might
>be useful.  We'd need to work out a lot of implementation details.

Sounds like a good idea to me.

    Norman Shapiro