[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:37:34 -0800 |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>
>4) In terms of alternate mail stores, be they Maildir or IMAP (I think
>those are the two major candidates now, right?), I think those ideas
>are interesting. The #1 problem with those ideas is how to map MH
>message numbers (which can range 1-MAXINT, with holes) to the internal
>key used by those mail stores; everything else is relatively easy
>to deal with.
I can't quite tell if by "alternate", you meant optional. I certainly hope
so.