[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:13:15 +0000 |
Hi Paul,
> most invocations of my wrapper commands record their parent's pid in a
> well-known file. the wrapper for rmm, when not given a specific
> argument (i.e., "d", rather than "d 32") checks to make sure its
> parent's pid is the same as what's recorded in the file
Nice idea.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Jon Steinhart, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12