Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7

[Tom Lane]

address@hidden writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:57:43 +0100, Ralph Corderoy said:
>> And nmh in Fedora, but it's not in a Red Hat?

> It's not in the EPEL repos either (which are basically extras
> from Fedora built for Red Hat).  Might be hard to get it into
> Red Hat without somebody at RH taking it under its wing, but
> EPEL is controlled by Fedora, so probably could the Fedora
> package owner to roll an EPEL version?

Yeah.  Try filing a bugzilla request for that (against the existing
nmh package, I think).

As you say, the hurdle to getting it into core RHEL is a lot higher,
but I think EPEL is pretty easy if there's already a Fedora package.

                        regards, tom lane