[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] forw
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] forw |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:56:54 -0400 |
>This message is not a complaint, a request, or even a suggestion. It just
>represents my wanting to understand the design of forw better. It seems to me
>that there ought to be an option, indeed the default, for the new
>message to contain all the attachments in the forward messages. When I forw
>messages, is it not my intent that the receiver of the new message should
>receive all the information in the forwarded messages? How am I wrong?
Are you saying it doesn't? Because when I use forw it sure includes the
complete message, including attachments.
(It may be that you want to use forw -mime).
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] forw, norm, 2016/10/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, norm, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, norm, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, David Levine, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, norm, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, Paul Vixie, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, norm, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] forw, norm, 2016/10/10