[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:50:40 -0700 |
> On Oct 10, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> i vote for presenting the user with a user-friendly component name.
>> if conflict is an issue, could we make the names of these "special"
>> headers tuneable via a profile entry?
>> Nmh-Attach-Component: Attach
>> Nmh-Forward-Component: Forward
>
> FWIW, I am _not_ a fan of making this adjustable. I would say that it would
> create more code and more documentation, for very little benefit.
Amen!
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), bergman, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), norm, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10