[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:51:58 -0400 |
>> I realize that sounds harsh, but I am trying to understand why leaking
>> those headers would be harmful.
>
>If they're are mistyped Attach, Bcc, or Dcc then they could be
>embarrassing?
Well ... sure? But I think that's an issue with any header name.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/14