[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw.man
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw.man |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:55:11 +0000 |
Hi,
> > I can see why the `(5)' is dropped on the second reference, so soon
> > after the first, but why does it become bold instead of italic?
For completeness, Larry replied, accidentally off list, to say that was
just a simple mistake. And I agree with kre's comment on the `contains'
v. `is'.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw.man, Robert Elz, 2017/03/17