[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to mh-draft.man
From: |
Larry Hynes |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to mh-draft.man |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:28:52 +0000 |
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> > directly, they supply
> > .B send
> > -with the UNIX pathname of the message draft, and
> > -.B not
> > -a
> > +with the UNIX pathname of the message draft; NOT a
> > .B \-draftmessage
> > .I msg
> > argument. As far as
>
> Must we shout for emphasis? :-)
Oh - you were talking about NOT! lol.
Yes, the use of NOT is well-established - 19 instances. I do think
it's preferable to
.B not
in case some poor soul things not(1) is an nmh command. (It sort
of sounds like one, in fairness.)