[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2018 21:11:47 -0500 |
i wrote:
> > but i don't think i'll hold up actually implementing -noprint, for the
> > folder command, on the development branch.
i've pushed support for -noprint to master. default behaviors remain as
they've always been, but supplying -noprint now suppresses the folder
summary info, as you'd expect.
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 24.8 degrees)
- [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, valdis . kletnieks, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?,
Paul Fox <=