[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh.
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh. |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:12:28 -0500 |
tom wrote:
> Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
> > I am subscribed, but occasionally I want to look at the archives. I am
> > not a member of any other list that is restricted to subscribers only.
> > Are you actually arguing this makes sense?
>
> FWIW, I am on quite a few other lists that restrict their archives
> to subscribers. It's not that insane a policy, though I agree it
> doesn't really seem necessary for exmh-users.
>
> If you want it changed, this is hardly the right list to be complaining
> on.
of course, once one is on the right list, then one has access to
the archives, making the whole conversation, in the eyes of those
defending the policy, moot. hard to have a rational conversation
about the issue in that context.
it's a dumb policy. makes me think the people on the exmh list have
something to hide.
paul
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 46.8 degrees)
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., (continued)
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ken Hornstein, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., HÃ¥kon Alstadheim, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ken Hornstein, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Tom Lane, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh.,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ken Hornstein, 2018/11/07
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/11/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Andy Bradford, 2018/11/08
- Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., valdis . kletnieks, 2018/11/08
Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh., Andy Bradford, 2018/11/08