[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nmh 1.8?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: nmh 1.8? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Dec 2022 22:00:19 +0000 |
Hi David,
> HEAD builds and tests cleanly for me on Fedora, Solaris 11, and
> Cygwin.
Good to hear. I had a ‘All 118 tests passed’ with
1.7-branchpoint-884-gf116eb31 when doing ‘NMH_VALGRIND=1 VALGRIND_ME=1
make check’ on a friend's quicker PC running Manjaro.
> Do you or anyone else have anything else you'd like to put in before
> starting the 1.8 release cycle?
Nothing which should hold it up. I'm dabbling with mh-chart.man and
the bash-completion generation at the moment, fixing a little bit of
degradation, but it way well not meet the cut and that wouldn't bother me.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: nmh 1.8?, (continued)
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ken Hornstein, 2022/12/26
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Paul Fox, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Paul Fox, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ken Hornstein, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ken Hornstein, 2022/12/28
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/12/31
- Re: nmh 1.8?, David Levine, 2022/12/31
- Re: nmh 1.8?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ken Hornstein, 2022/12/31
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ken Hornstein, 2022/12/31
- Re: nmh 1.8?, Ken Hornstein, 2022/12/31
Re: nmh 1.8?, Kevin Cosgrove, 2022/12/31