Re: mysterious c0 80

[Michael Richardson]

Ken Hornstein <kenh@pobox.com> wrote:
    > However, it seems like Mike's problem is NOT that; the last two bytes of
    > his draft file are 00 a0.  Cy's bug report said that can happen anywhere,
    > though.

!

    > I know this change was to handle NUL bytes in outgoing messages, but I am
    > wondering if maybe we should reject such drafts?  Seems like any message
    > actually sent with a NUL in it would be rather unfriendly.  That might
    > break things for people using MH-E, though, and as we've seen before that
    > has a very long release cycle.

yeah, it's not so much that it does not get releases, as people do not
install them often.

This break, if it has a good/clear error would get fixed, I think.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature