|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55481] Plotting differences from Matlab at 5.0 release |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:59:42 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:65.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/65.0 |
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #55481 (project octave): Wrt the isonormals demo: Matlab seems to point some of the automatically calculated normals in the opposite direction from what Octave does. That should probably be handled in a dedicated bug. Wrt the light demos: I don't see what you describe in demo 5. Could you please elaborate? In the right column of demo 9 and 10, it looks like "unlit" has the same effect as "lit" in Matlab (like you already wrote in comment #0). I consider this a bug in Matlab and believe Octave is actually doing better in this case. To be honest, I don't know what Matlab is doing in the upper left subplot of demo 10. It doesn't look "reverselit" to me... _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55481> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |