[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64
From: |
Guillaume |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64 |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:23:34 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #55608 (project octave):
Yes, I use:
./configure --enable-octave=stable --enable-binary-packages
--enable-devel-tools --enable-qt5 --disable-system-opengl --enable-windows-64
--enable-64 --enable-lib64-directory
With this, one gets an error when building gcc-cloog:
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/7/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
cannot find -lisl
All the libraries are in usr/lib64 but looking at log/gcc-cloog:
checking our pkgconfig ldflags... -L/tmp/mxe-octave/usr/lib
If one creates a symbolic link lib -> lib64, cloog is successfully build but
there will be further issues down the line with gcc.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55608>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, Guillaume, 2019/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, John Donoghue, 2019/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64,
Guillaume <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, John Donoghue, 2019/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, Guillaume, 2019/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, John Donoghue, 2019/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, John W. Eaton, 2019/01/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55608] [MXE Octave] lib vs lib64, John Donoghue, 2019/01/31